@luka.ono_ · Professional Tennis Player · Campinas, Brazil · Born Jan 28 2005

LUKA ONO
ANALYTICS

DATA-DRIVEN PERFORMANCE INTELLIGENCE · MAY 2026

21Age · DOB Jan 2005

#1.827ATP Singles Career High

#1.784ATP Doubles Career High

30+ITF Future Tournaments

4Challenger Appearances

RH · 2HBHStyle · 180cm / 75kg

CAREER PATH:

ITF M25/M15Current · ATP ~1.951

——→

ChallengerTarget · rank ~100–500

——→

ATP TourLong-range · top 250+

Coaches: Ricardo Siggia · Alexandre Bonatto

01Analytics Modules6 domains

Module 01 · Benchmarks

LevelComparison

Structural benchmarks across ATP Tour, Challenger, and ITF M25/M15. Points per game, rally distribution, serve/return asymmetry, and key findings for Luka's development path.

Module 02 · Career

Career &Ranking

Tournament results, ranking history, and career trajectory. ITF and ATP point progression, surface breakdown, and win/loss records by tournament level.

Module 03 · Tactics

Tactics &Game Patterns

Pattern-of-play analysis based on Cahill, Mouratoglou, and Ferrero frameworks. Serve construction, rally patterns, transition quality, and tactical priorities by surface.

Module 04 · Physical

PhysicalTraining

Periodization protocols, training load metrics, and physical development targets. Strength, speed, and endurance benchmarks aligned to ITF and Challenger metabolic demands.

Module 05 · Physiology

Physiology &Monitoring

Whoop band data: HRV, recovery score, sleep, and strain. Match and training load monitoring aligned to Olav Aleksander Bu's physiological framework for elite tennis.

Module 06 · Nutrition

Nutrition &Health

Nutrition protocols and health guidelines based on Peter Attia and Olav Aleksander Bu frameworks. Tournament nutrition, recovery fueling, and body composition targets.

02Development PrioritiesSprint 02 · May 2026

@luka.ono_ · Luka Bojičić Ono · Application Layer

→ CURRENT FOCUS AREAS

01Build serve hold rate to Challenger norms (≥83%). Current ITF hold rate (~68%) is a structural liability. Requires placement repeatability, pressure-routine management, and 1st serve % consistently above 60%.

02Train the 5–8 shot construction block explicitly. Practice design must extend beyond S+1/R+1 to systematic 3rd and 4th shot patterns off both wings.

03Close the serve/return asymmetry gap: 9pp → 16pp. Serve dominance is the architectural target on the path from ITF to Challenger.

04Periodize energy systems for ITF metabolic reality. Recovery and nutrition periodization must account for higher per-set stress from more contested points.